Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Rogers,
In 1976 The Bell Telephone Company (Bell) filed new tariffs with the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission showing proposed changes in its intrastate telephone rates caculated to produce additional revenues of $137,635,000 and expense savings of $10,585,-000. The PUC suspended Bell’s proposed tariff revi*409sions and instituted an investigation. The thirty-seven complaints filed against the new tariffs, including those of the Consumer Advocate and Westinghouse Electric Corporation, were consolidated with the investigation proceedings. By order entered in short form on…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- West Penn Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Lang v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- County of Beaver v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pennsylvania Industrial Energy Coalition v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Tripps Park Civic Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Scott Paper Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.