Legal Opinion

Smith v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 1960No. Appeal, No. 149PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, P. J.,

This is an appeal by Claude Smith, a certificated carrier, from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission denying his application for additional transportation authority and ordering him to cease and desist from the transportation of property except as previously authorized. Appellant contends on this appeal that the commission violated appellant’s constitutional rights, or committed errors of law in giving consideration to an alleged commission staff report without affording appellant an opportunity to examine the report, and in issuing a cease and desist…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Market Street Railway Co. v. Railroad Commission of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Willapoint Oysters, Inc. v. EwingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  5. Unora v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mechanic Falls Water Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
  2. Connecticut Natural Gas Corp. v. Public Utilities Control AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Department of Highways v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Duquesne Light Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API