Legal Opinion

Hannin v. Fisher

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 1935No. Civ. 8762PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROTH, J., pro tem.

On October 19, 1927, a mortgage in which appellant Western Loan & Building Company (hereinafter referred to as Loan Company) was mortgagee, and appellant Frederick Fisher, mortgagor, was recorded in the official records of Los Angeles County, to secure the payment of $60,000, a construction loan for the erection of an apartment house on the premises described in the mortgage.

On December 1, 1927, H. S. Jones & Co., plumbing contractors (plaintiffs’ assignors) entered into a written contract with appellant Stratford Holding Company whereby it “agrees to furnish all labor and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Palmer v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Ewing v. HaywardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Dauch v. GinsburgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Perkins v. MettlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Broadway Improvement & Investment Co. v. TumanskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Zingheim v. MarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Chico Tractor, Inc. v. CoyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Grosso v. Monfalcone, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API