Ewing v. Hayward
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Neither party to this appeal has given us any statement of the case. We have, therefore, been put to the labor of going through the pleadings, findings, etc., to get as best we could an understanding as to what the controversy is about.
As near as we have been able to ascertain from the record before us, the action is brought by plaintiff to recover on a certain contract, alleged to have been entered into between plaintiff and a copartnership doing business in Imperial County, this state, under the firm name and style of Hayward, Rath Marshall, which copartnership, according to the allegations…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wheeler v. FarmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Nofsinger v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Smith v. Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Ferris v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Pease v. FinkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Coughlin v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Shapiro v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Klinger v. Modesto Fruit Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Hospelhorn v. PoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- Walsh v. American Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.