Legal Opinion
Palmer v. Howard
California Supreme Court
Decided May 20, 1887No. 11653PublishedCited by 31 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County,-and from an order refusing a new trial. Action for the claim and delivery of certain printing materials. The further facts are stated in the opinion. Levi Chase, for Appellant, cited Hart v. Barney, 7 Fed. Rep. 553; Heryford v. Davis, 102 U. S. 235; Harkness v. Russell, 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 51.
1Opinion of the Court
Hayne, C.
— The plaintiff delivered to one St. Clair and wife certain personal property, under a writing, of which the following is a copy: —
“ San Francisco, March 26, 1885.
“ D. Parker St. Clair and Wipe, San Diego, Cal.: — Borrowed and received of Palmer and Eey, 405-407 San-some Street, San Francisco, the following articles in good order. If the price set against them is paid, as per memorandum below, the property is then to belong to said borrower; otherwise it remains the property of Palmer and Eey. Notes and drafts, or renewals of the same, if given, are not to be considered payment until…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Heryford v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Hegler v. EddyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
- Kohler v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Grant v. SkinnerNew York Supreme Court · 1854
3Cited by31 opinions
- Van Allen v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Smitton v. McCulloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Oakland Bank of Savings v. California Pressed Brick Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Stockton Savings & Loan Society v. PurvisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Liver v. MillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.