Legal Opinion

Chico Tractor, Inc. v. Coyle

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 25, 1963No. Civ. 10489PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, J.

Plaintiff, a creditor o£ Bainhridge, had in its possession a used forklift, or forklift tractor, which Bainhridge had consigned to it for sale. Plaintiff brought suit against Bainbridge and on September 16, 1959, levied an attachment on the forklift. After a default judgment plaintiff on January 25, 1960, levied execution on the forklift. Robert Coyle then filed a third party claim, asserting his own title to the forklift. After hearing evidence, the trial court, referring to Coyle and one Robert E. Smith as “claimants,” found that these claimants were the owners of the forklift and ordered…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Steiner v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Mitchell v. Automobile Owners Indemnity UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. First National Bank v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Perkins v. MettlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Treat v. TreatCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Trinity Tractor Co. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Challenge-Cook Bros., Inc. v. LantzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Oak Knoll Broadcasting Corp. v. HudgingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Amacorp Industrial Leasing Co. v. Robert C. Young Associates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API