Legal Opinion
Dauch v. Ginsburg
California Supreme Court
Decided December 31, 1931No. Docket No. L.A. 10932PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Plaintiff brought this action for the recovery of certain described personal property, or for the value thereof in case delivery could not be had, and for damages for its alleged wrongful detention. Defendants Ginsburg consented to a default judgment being entered against them. Defendants Standard Mortgage Corporation and Lincoln Investment Company defended the action. The cause was tried before the court without a jury, and resulted in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the return of the property or for the sum of $18,500, its reasonable value, if defendants could not make…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hendy v. DinkerhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Oakland Bank of Savings v. California Pressed Brick Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Fratt v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Watterson v. CruseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Kirkman Nurseries v. SargentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Trabue Pittman Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- M. P. Moller, Inc. v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Southern California Telephone Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Broadway Improvement & Investment Co. v. TumanskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Bell v. Bank of PerrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.