Legal Opinion
Zingheim v. Marshall
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 27, 1967No. Civ. 8151; Civ. 8152PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhelan, J.
Appeals have been taken in two actions consolidated for trial; separate judgments were given based upon separate findings of fact. In both actions plaintiff recovered judgment: in action No. 275082 against Gordon A. Rogers (Rogers), and in action No. 262878 against Robert S. Marshall (Marshall) and Rogers. Both defendants have appealed.
Facts in Support op Judgments
Prior to November 24, 1958, plaintiff operated commercial radio broadcasting station XEMO in Tijuana, Mexico. The station was licensed under Mexican law to one Fernando Fer reirá (Ferreira), a Mexican national. Under Mexican law,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Klinger v. Modesto Fruit Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Stafford v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Automatic Vending Co. v. WisdomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Craig v. BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Ewing v. HaywardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- International Security Life Insurance Co. v. SprayTexas Supreme Court · 1971
- Lynch v. GlassCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Clifton Cattle Co. v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Orrock v. Crouse Realtors, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Lynch v. GlassCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975