Legal Opinion

Grosso v. Monfalcone, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 23, 1936No. Civ. 9615PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, P. J.

As disclosed by the record herein, it appears that the defendant Monfalcone, Inc., a corporation, was the owner of a boat which, in accordance with an agreement that existed between Monfalcone, Inc., and one Bob Goldie relative to a division of profits, was being operated by the latter for “amusement” purposes; that in thus operating the said boat, defendant Tommy Jacobs was in charge thereof as manager; that in the course of conducting the “amusement” afforded on said boat, its electrical lighting system became out of order, with the result that, at the instance and the direction of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bryant v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Klinger v. Modesto Fruit Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Ewing v. HaywardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. McDevitt v. Chas. Corriea & Bros.California Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. Miller v. San Francisco Church Extension Society of Methodist Episcopal ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hart v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. Joseph Denunzio Fruit Co. v. CraneDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948
  3. Luce v. SuttonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Zingheim v. MarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API