Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Mettler

California Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1899No. L.A. No. 568PublishedCited by 19 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GBAY, C.

—The above parties named as insolvents and the defendant Mettler entered into a written agreement, of which the following is a copy:

“This agreement, between C. W. Mettler, as vendor, and A. M. Mealey and Mrs. C. W. Stetson, partners under the firm name of A. M. Mealey & Go., as vendees, witnesseth:
“The vendor agrees to sell to the vendees, and they agree to buy from him, all that certain stock of merchandise, including a general assortment of hardware, belonging to the vendor and now in and about the branch store heretofore maintained by the vendor.at Colton, together with all…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harkness v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Van Allen v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Palmer v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Hegler v. EddyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Kohler v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Oakland Bank of Savings v. California Pressed Brick Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Silverstin v. Kohler & ChaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Triplett v. Mansur & Tebbetts Implement Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1900
  4. Kennedy v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Lundy Furniture Co. v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API