Legal Opinion
Vance v. Chao
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 2, 2007No. Civil Action 07-00002 (ESH)PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Edna L. Vance has brought suit alleging that, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., the Department of Labor improperly rated her performance, placed her on a performance plan, and denied her a performance award in retaliation for her having filed and pursued a prior employment discrimination lawsuit. Defendant has moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. For the reasons set forth herein, the Court will deny the motion.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff is an…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Bryant v. PepcoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Winston v. CloughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Dudley v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Munro v. LahoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Smith-Thompson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.