Legal Opinion
Munro v. Lahood
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 21, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-0098PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AMY BERMAN JACKSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff John Munro brings this action against Ray LaHood, Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation (“DOT”), under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 701 et seq., alleging gender and disability discrimination, retaliation, and hostile work environment by his employer, DOT. Defendant moves the Court to dismiss the complaint or, in the alternative, to grant summary judgment for defendant [Dkt. # 9]. Defendant contends that the…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Badwal v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Bonnette v. ShinsekiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Massaquoi v. District of Columbia GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Doak v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Aldrich v. BurwellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.