Graham v. Mayor & Bd. of Trs. of Fresno
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate to the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the City of Fresno. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
The city of Fresno is a city organized under a freeholders’ charter framed and adopted under the provisions of section 8 of article XI of the constitution of this state, and approved by the legislature on January 28, 1901, (Stats. 1901, p. 832). According to the federal census of 1900, it has a population of more than ten thousand and less than fifteen thousand, and therefore if we assume that the provisions of the General Classification Act, as amended March 5, 1901, (Stats. 1901, p. 94,) apply, it is a city of the fourth class within the meaning of section 103 of the Code of Civil…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. ToalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- People ex rel. Wood v. SandsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Conlin v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Ex parte Ah YouCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Ex parte SotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Nicholl v. KosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Villanazul v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Puterbaugh v. WadhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Fleming v. HanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.