Legal Opinion

Puterbaugh v. Wadham

California Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1912No. S.F. No. 6014PublishedCited by 33 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate directed to the auditing committee and the city auditor of the city of San Diego. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Petitioner, George Puterbaugh, justice of the peace of the city of San Diego, asks this court for a writ of mandate to compel the auditing committee and the city auditor of said city of San Diego to draw warrants for the payment of his salary. Respondents demur generally to the petition. They also file answers without waiving the demurrers, but these answers admit all essential matters of fact pleaded in the petition; therefore our conclusions upon the demurrers will suffice to settle the whole subject before the court. The demurrer is based upon the assertion that the auditing committee and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wheaton v. North British and Merchantile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Fowler v. PeirceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
  3. In re MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Kahn v. SutroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. People v. Wong WangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Kennedy v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Tulare Water Co. v. State Water CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Aebli v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Dufton v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API