Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Conlin v. Board of Supervisors

California Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1896No. S. F. No. 299PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. D. J. Murphy, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

At the last session of the legislature the following act was passed March 28, 1895 (Stats. 1895, p. 348):

“ Section 1. The board of supervisors of the city and county of San Francisco is hereby authorized and directed to order paid to John J. Conlin, or his assigns or legal representatives, the sum of sixty-one thousand five hundred and seventy-seven ($61,577) dollars.
“ Seo. 2. The auditor of said city and county of San Francisco is hereby authorized and directed to audit the demand for the said sum of money named in section 1, and to issue his warrant therefor to John J. Conlin, his assigns…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stevenson v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. People ex rel. Blanding v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Conlin v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Sinton v. AshburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Creighton v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. City of Oakland v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. County of San Diego v. HammondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Goodall v. BriteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Steele County v. ErskineCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  5. Fleming v. HanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API