Legal Opinion

People v. Toal

California Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1890No. 20610PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

The appellant was convicted in the court below of an assault to commit murder. From the judgment, and an order denying him a new trial, he appeals. *334The judgment was reversed by this court (People v. Toal, 23 Pac. Rep. 203), and a rehearing granted. It was urged upon us in the petition for a rehearing that the effect of the decision was to oust the police judges of the city of Los Angeles from office without a hearing. Upon the second hearing, the police judges, as well as the attorneys in the case, and at least one amicus curise, were allowed to be heard, orally and by printed briefs, and the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brooks v. FischerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Hull v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Ex parte LloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. People v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Buckner v. VeuveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. In re ClohertyWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Mullan v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Taylor v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Idol v. StreetSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Fleming v. HanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API