Fleming v. Hance
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate to the Treasurer of the City of Los Angeles. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The petitioner applied to the district court of appeal for a writ of mandate directing the treasurer of the city of Los Angeles to pay the petitioner’s demand for salary as prosecuting attorney of the police court of said city. The court of appeal, after a hearing following the issuance of an alternative writ, granted a peremptory writ, whereupon the matter was by this court ordered to be transferred here for hearing and determination.
No issue of fact is raised by the respondent, the only question being whether the facts alleged by the petitioner entitle him to the relief sought.
The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Von Schmidt v. WidberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Sinton v. AshburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- People v. ToalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Graham v. Mayor & Bd. of Trs. of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Ex parte SparksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Younger v. County of El DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. HallnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Shepherd v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Cooper v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Nicholl v. KosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.