Legal Opinion
Villanazul v. City of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
Decided August 31, 1951No. L. A. 21398; L. A. 21348; L. A. 21425PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
In separate actions, Mercy Villanazul is suing the City of Los Angeles, the County of Los Angeles and the State of California to recover damages assertedly caused by the negligence of Muriel C. Gregg in the operation of an automobile. The complaints allege that, at the time of the accident, Gregg was a deputy marshal of the Municipal Court of the City of Los Angeles and acting within the scope and during the course of his employment. By general demurrer the city, the county and the state each disclaimed liability. The demurrers were sustained without leave to amend, and the consolidated…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Press Publishing Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Nicholl v. KosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Industrial Indemnity Exchange v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Riskin v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Fernelius v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Clements v. T. R. Bechtel Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Buford v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- County of Madera v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- The People Of The State Of California v. The Italian Motorship IliceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Bradley v. CAL. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.