Legal Opinion
Ex parte Ah You
California Supreme Court
Decided January 1, 1890No. 20586PublishedCited by 17 opinions
Application for a writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
This is a proceeding upon habeas corpus. The facts out of which the case arises are stipulated as follows: —
“ 1. That on the fourteenth day of February, 1889, a charter (framed and adopted in accordance with constitutional amendment No. 16, approved March 10, 1887, *340statutes of 1887, page 88) became and ever since has been and now is the organic law of the city of Oakland.
“2. That at a municipal election duly and regularly h eld in the city of Oakland, under the provisions of said charter, one Alexander Laidlaw received certain votes, being a majority of all the votes cast for police…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People ex rel. Daniels v. HenshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by17 opinions
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Davies v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- State ex rel. City of Seattle v. CarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- In re MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- State of California v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.