Nicholl v. Koster
California Supreme Court
PETITION for Writ of Mandate to the Auditor of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an original action in this court in mcm damus, to compel the defendant, as auditor of the city and county of San Francisco, to approve and allow the demand of the plaintiff for $125, alleged to be due and payable to-him out of the treasury of said city and county, for his salary for the month of April, 1909, as assistant probation officer, under the act approved March 8, 1909. (Stats. 1909, p. 213.)
This act provides for the care, custody, and maintenance of dependent and delinquent children, defines such children; gives to the superior court of the county jurisdiction to determine…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People ex rel. Attorney General v. ProvinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Fleming v. HanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Graham v. Mayor & Bd. of Trs. of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Robert v. Police Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1905
- Jackson v. BaehrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Brydonjack v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Superior Court v. County of MendocinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Johnson v. BradleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.