Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Gulf Oil Corporation

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 27, 1943No. 29788PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

This is an action to cancel an oil and gas lease and for damages. Plaintiffs, owners of one-fourth of the royalty interest, in three causes of action, alleged: (1) That the lease had been abandoned, (2) that defendants had breached the implied covenants of the lease, and (3) that plaintiffs had been damaged by defendant’s refusal to surrender the lease upon demand. Prayer was for cancellation of the entire lease and for damages.

Defendant Gulf Oil Corporation, owner and operator of the lease, by answer alleged: (1) That plaintiffs together owned only one-fourth of the royalty interest, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Doss Oil Royalty Co. v. Texas CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  2. Fox Petroleum Co. v. BookerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Crump v. LanhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Maynard v. HusteadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Moschos v. BaylessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Sinclair Oil & Gas Company v. BishopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  2. Townsend v. Creekmore-Rooney CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  3. Trust Co. Of Chicago v. Samedan Oil CorpCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  4. Texas Consolidated Oils v. VannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  5. Commercial Communications, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Board of Public AffairsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API