Legal Opinion
Sinclair Oil & Gas Company v. Bishop
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 6, 1968No. 40585PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BERRY, Justice.
This action was brought by the lessors to cancel lessees’ oil and gas lease for failure to prudently develop, operate, and produce the same, in violation of implied covenants and express terms of an oil and gas lease.
The lease, or leases, involved cover tract herein identified as the Bishop tract or lease. This lease was acquired originally from the lessors by Sinclair Oil and Gas Company, which in turn was assigned to Woods Petroleum Corporation, which in turn assigned the lease to Harper Oil Company and Republic Natural Gas Company. The named oil company defendants are…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Katchen v. LandySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Franklin v. Margay Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Suburban Land Co. v. Town of BillericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Mitchell Realty Co. v. City of West AllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Bearmar v. Dux Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Bartlett v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Cleary Petroleum Corp. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Voiles v. Santa Fe Minerals, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- WRG Construction Co. v. HoebelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Mullins v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.