Legal Opinion

Crump v. Lanham

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 29, 1917No. 4976PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRainey, J.

One P. G. Lanham instituted this action in the district court of Garvin county, Okla., against R. L. Garrett and W. B. Crump, for the cancellation of a note and mortgage in favor of R. L. Garrett, and assigned before maturity to W. B, Crump. Plaintiff alleged in substance that the note and mortgage were secured from .him by fraud, and were without consideration and void; that the consideration for the execution of said note was a “Little Crater crude oil burner contract,” which Parrett, through his agent, W. C. Frost, represented to the plaintiff would cost $5,000, and that Frost pretended…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Schock v. FishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. McCoy v. McCoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Apache State Bank v. DanielsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Hogan v. LeeperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Wat-Tah-Noh-Zhe v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Pelham Petroleum Co. v. NorthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Johnson v. HerringMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  3. McGrath v. EichoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Gorman v. CarlockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Elliott v. BondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API