Legal Opinion

Texas Consolidated Oils v. Vann

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 24, 1953No. 35265PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Neal, J.

The question before us arises in a proceeding by the owners of an 80-acre tract of land in Caddo county, to obtain a cancellation of an oil and gas lease executed by them and by assignment held by the operators, upon plaintiffs’ contention that the operators have abandoned the lease and have failed to develop the same by drilling additional wells, thereby breaching the implied covenants thereof, and have failed to protect the land from oil and gas drainage from wells drilled on adjacent lands. For the reasons hereinafter stated, we hold that the court’s decree and judgment requiring the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Doss Oil Royalty Co. v. Texas CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  2. Strange v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Pelham Petroleum Co. v. NorthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. York v. TriggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. Walden v. PottsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Olson v. SchwartzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Johnson v. HamillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Wilds v. Universal Resources Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  4. Townsend v. Creekmore-Rooney Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  5. Coal Oil and Gas Company v. StyronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API