Legal Opinion

Maynard v. Hustead

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 25, 1939No. 28205PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

The principal question to be determined in this action is the sufficiency of the delivery and acceptance of a deed, executed by the grantor, now deceased, during her lifetime and deposited with a third person with instructions to deliver same to the grantees in event of the death of the grantor.

The undisputed facts are these: Charles E. Douglas and Alice M. Douglas were husband and wife. They had one child, Irene Taylor. Alice M. Douglas had a niece and nephew, Sylvia Hustead Grove and Frank Hustead, who had, during the early years of their life, lived for a time with Mr. and Mrs. Douglas. On…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  2. Snodgrass v. SnodgrassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Apache State Bank v. DanielsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Shaffer v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Yarbrough v. BellamySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  2. Ferguson v. Gulf Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  3. Maynard v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Green v. ComerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. White v. MorrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API