Legal Opinion

Commercial Communications, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Board of Public Affairs

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 17, 1980No. 52022PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HODGES, Justice.

The Oklahoma Board of Public Affairs [appellant — Board] solicited bids for intercom equipment on October 13, 1976. The solicitation specified “Executone” or “approved equal” equipment. Although the solicitation listed the model numbers, it did not contain a set of specifications for the brand listed. Commercial Communications, Inc. [appellee] was determined to be the lowest and best bidder, and it was awarded the contract. After the equipment was installed, the Board refused to honor the contract, and ordered Commercial Communications to remove the equipment.

Commercial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Peyton v. McCaslinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  2. West v. MadanskySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Quapaw Co. v. VarnellCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
  4. Ferguson v. Gulf Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. Mosier v. WalterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Palace Exploration Co. v. Petroleum Development Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  2. Sabine Corp. v. ONG Western, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1989
  3. LPCX CORP. v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  4. Butcher v. McGinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  5. Smith v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API