Legal Opinion

Townsend v. Creekmore-Rooney Company

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 12, 1958No. 37640PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was initiated by plaintiffs in error, plaintiffs below, against defendants in error, defendants below, to cancel an oil and gas lease on the NJ4 of the NE14, and the SE14 of the NE14, Section 5, Township 13 North, Range 6 East, I. M., Lincoln County, Oklahoma, and to recover royalty payments under the lease alleged to have been lost to lessors by reason of drainage permitted by the lessees. Trial was to the court, and the defendants’ motion for judgment at the conclusion of plaintiffs’ evidence was sustained. Plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial was denied and they have appealed. We…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gypsy Oil Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Strange v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. McVicker v. Horn, Robinson & NathanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  4. Fox Petroleum Co. v. BookerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Howard v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Wood v. TXO Production Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Stewart v. Amerada Hess Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. Snow v. WinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. HALL v. GALMORSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  5. Feland v. Placid Oil CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API