Legal Opinion
In Re Garner
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 16, 1990No. 88-1330PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Per curiam
Respondent is a member of the bars of the State of New York and the District of Columbia. In 1984, in a disciplinary proceeding, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York determined that respondent was guilty of two charges of dishonesty and misrepresentation arising out of his representation of a New York couple in a California adoption proceeding. In re Garner, 103 A.D.2d 390, 480 N.Y.S.2d 127 (2d Dept.1984), modified, 107 A.D.2d 653, 484 N.Y.S.2d 791, appeal dismissed, 65 N.Y.2d 636, 480 N.E.2d 752, 491 N.Y.S.2d 1030 (1985). The court concluded that he had falsified the names…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matter of GoldbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Matter of VelasquezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- MATTER OF LARSEN v. CanaryNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- In Re ReidDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- In Re BrickleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- In Re GoffeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re SlosbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re BergerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- In Re JacobyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- In Re GubermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.