Legal Opinion
In Re Lyles
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 18, 1996No. 94-BG-1408PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Per curiam
The Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”) has recommended that respondent, a member of our bar, be suspended from the practice of law for six months, and that she be required to demonstrate her fitness to practice before being reinstated. While this case was pending, the Board filed a motion with the court seeking respondent’s temporary suspension under Rule XI, § 3(c) of this court’s Rules Governing the Bar. The court granted the motion and temporarily suspended respondent on December 15,1995, pending a final decision in her case.
A copy of the Board’s report and recommendation,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- In Re MicheelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re SteeleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- In Re PeekDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- In the Matter of ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Matter of DoryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- In Re CaterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re HallmarkDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re BernsteinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- In Re EvansDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.