Legal Opinion

In re Bradley

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 2013No. 12-BG-1205PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

This disciplinary case is before us on exceptions filed by respondent, Stephanie Y. Bradley, to the Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility (the “Board”). The Board found that respondent committed one violation of Rule 1.1(a) (incompetence), one violation of Rule 1.1(b) (failure to employ requisite skill and care commensurate with practitioners in similar matters), one violation of Rule 1.3(a) (lack of diligence and zeal), one violation of Rule 1.8(b)(1) (intentional failure to seek clients’ lawful objectives), one violation of Rule 1.3(c) (failure to act with…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. In Re MicheelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. In Re CaterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. In Re AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. In Re TempleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re Olekanma A. Ekekwe-KauffmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. In re Harry TunDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. In re Seth Adam RobbinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. In re Brigitte L. AdamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. In re Nathaniel H. SpeightsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API