Legal Opinion

In re Rodriguez-Quesada

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 13, 2015No. 14-BG-848PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The Board on Professional Responsibility concluded that respondent Juan Lorenzo Rodriguez-Quesada violated numerous Rules of Professional Conduct during his representation of several clients in immigration matters. The Board recommends that this court suspend Mr. Rodriguez-Quesada for two years and, as a condition of reinstatement, require Mr. Rodriguez-Quesada to pay restitution to all but one of the affected clients. Mr. Rodriguez-Que-sada challenges the conclusions of the Board as to many of the rule violations and also argues that any suspension should be brief. The Office of Bar Counsel…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re GoffeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. In Re CaterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Bardoff v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. In Re KanuDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. In re HowesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re Harry TunDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. In re McClureDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. IN RE LAYN M. SAINT-LOUISDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. IN RE DONALD L. MCCLUREDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. IN RE LAYN M. SAINT-LOUISDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API