Legal Opinion
Matter of Sheehy
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 7, 1983No. M-59-80PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERN, Associate Judge:
D.C.App.Bar R. XI, § 7(3) provides in pertinent part:
[T]he Court shall accept the findings of fact made by the Board unless they are unsupported by substantial evidence of record, and shall adopt the recommended disposition of the Board unless to do so would foster a tendency toward inconsistent dispositions for comparable conduct or otherwise would be unwarranted.
That the respondent attorney here engaged in professional misconduct is not in dispute and hence there is no challenge to factual findings by the Board on Professional Responsibility. We accept the Board’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of HauptDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Matter of SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Matter of WillcherDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Matter of FogelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Matter of RussellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- In Re RosenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- In Re GubermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In Re ChapmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In Re De MaioDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.