Legal Opinion

Coastal Suburban Builders, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning Commission

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 4, 1984No. 2374PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.

This is an appeal1 from the denial of the plaintiffs’ petition for a writ of mandamus.

On June 14, 1980, the plaintiffs filed an application with the defendant planning and zoning commission to rezone a parcel of real estate, located in the town of East Haven, from an R-4 zone to a DRA-1 zone.2 They also applied, on that date, for a special exception for a multi-family use which would permit them to construct a sixty unit condominium complex on the property. The change of zone from R-4 to DRA-1 was a condition precedent to the granting of the application for a special exception.

On September…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Winslow v. Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  2. Vartuli v. SotireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. Summ v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
  4. Donohue v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  5. Parks v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Carr v. WoolwichConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  2. Cole v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  3. Homart Development Co. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  4. Par Developers, Ltd. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  5. Massimo v. Planning CommissionConnecticut Superior Court · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API