Legal Opinion

Homart Development Co. v. Planning & Zoning Commission

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 10, 1991No. 9967PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCretella, J.

This appeal arises from a judgment of the trial court dismissing the plaintiff developer’s *213appeal from the denial of its zone change application by the defendant planning and zoning commission. The plaintiff submitted the application in order to have certain land in Watertown redesignated as a Planned Regional Shopping District (PRSD) zone, pursuant to the town’s zoning regulations, as a precedent to the construction of the proposed Watertown Mall. The plaintiff argues that the trial court should not have upheld the action of the commission, claiming that it was illegal, arbitrary and an…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Primerica v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Sheridan v. Planning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  3. Calandro v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  4. Malafronte v. Planning & Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  5. McAdam v. SheldonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Campion v. Board of Aldermen of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  2. Campion v. Board of AldermenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  3. Daw v. Zoning Board of Appeals of WestportConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. MacKenzie v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  5. Cottle v. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF TOWN OF DARIENConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API