Legal Opinion
Vartuli v. Sotire
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 28, 1984No. 11572; 12365PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
The dispositive issue in these appeals is whether the provisions of the Coastal Management Act, which require local zoning authorities to render their decision on a coastal site plan within sixty-five days of the applicant’s submission of the plan, mandate automatic approval of the coastal site plan when the statutory period has expired without a decision.
The plaintiffs, Michael P. Vartuli and Waterside Plaza Associates, a general partnership in which Var-tuli owns the controlling interest, submitted a coastal site plan to the defendant Zoning Board of the City of Stamford (zoning board)…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Robinson v. Unemployment Security Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Doe v. Institute of Living, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Donohue v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Morningside Assn. v. Planning & Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Finn v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Dodd v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- McLaughlin Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- LeConche v. ElligersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. MagnanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.