Legal Opinion
Massimo v. Planning Commission
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided February 10, 1989No. File 80960PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFlynn, J.
The plaintiffs appeal to the Superior Court from the denial by the planning commission of the town of Naugatuck (commission) of their application for a special exception to excavate gravel from their premises at Brook Street and Donovan Road. Section 32 of the Naugatuck zoning regulations sets forth the procedure to be followed for special permits.
The court finds that the plaintiffs, as owners, are authorized under the statute to bring this action. They have proved their ownership from the date of application to the date of trial.
The plaintiffs claim that their appeal of the commission’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Vartuli v. SotireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. GrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Dooley v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Goldberg v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Petruzzi v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bauer v. Waste Management of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- First Church of Christ v. Historic District CommissionConnecticut Superior Court · 1998
- First Church of Christ v. Ridgefield Hist. Dist., No. 321192 (Mar. 3, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
- Fruscianti v. Westbrook Zoning Board of Appeals, No. 60825 (Apr. 7, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992
- Leshine v. Planning Zoning Commission, No. Cv98-0413985 (May 17, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.