Legal Opinion
Cole v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 5, 1996No. 13714PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.
The plaintiffs Toby deElye Cole, Sally deElye Cole and Lois Redington appeal from the judgment of the trial court affirming the defendant Cornwall planning and zoning commission’s (commission) passage of an amendment to its zoning regulations. The plaintiffs1 claim that the trial court improperly (1) concluded that the commission may enact a regulation that authorizes a special use permit that expires after a two year period, (2) concluded that the commission’s amendment to its regulations does not violate a Torring-ton area health district regulation, (3) considered evidence obtained outside…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bloom v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Protect Hamden/North Haven from Excessive Traffic & Pollution, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Connecticut Fund for the Environment, Inc. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Pizzola v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Torsiello v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bancroft v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Berlin Batting Cages, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Urbanowicz v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Grimes v. Conservation CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Sherman v. ShermanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.