Legal Opinion
Carr v. Woolwich
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 17, 1986No. 4019PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
This appeal involves the issue of whether the failure of the defendant planning and zoning com*685mission to act upon the plaintiffs application for a zoning permit for a permitted use of his property within the time constraints set by General Statutes § 8-7d results in the automatic approval of the application. The trial court held that it did so result. We find no error.
The facts are not in dispute. On October 11, 1983, the plaintiff filed with the defendant Bridgewater planning and zoning commission an application for a zoning permit pursuant to § 2.2.3 of the Bridgewater zoning regulations,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Vartuli v. SotireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Donohue v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Finn v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Coastal Suburban Builders, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- University Realty, Inc. v. Planning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
3Cited by20 opinions
- Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Gelinas v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Leo Fedus & Sons Construction Co. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Caron v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- SSM Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.