Legal Opinion
Par Developers, Ltd. v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 28, 1995No. 12935PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
This is a mandamus action in which the plaintiff appeals from a judgment rendered in favor of the defendant. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) determined that the plaintiff failed to establish a clear right to the relief requested, (2) determined that the plaintiff failed to submit a copy of the subdivision application to the inland wetlands and watercourses commission (wetlands commission), and (3) found that the defendant was not otherwise required by operation of law to issue a subdivision permit to the plaintiff.1 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Protect Hamden/North Haven from Excessive Traffic & Pollution, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Vartuli v. SotireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Stolberg v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Finn v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Whisper Wind Development Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jalowiec Realty Associates, L.P. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Megin v. ZONING BD. OF APP. OF NEW MILFORDConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- MacKenzie v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Fagan v. City of StamfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Lawrence v. Dept. of Energy & Environmental ProtectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.