Legal Opinion

Ahrens v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 30, 2004No. 02-115 CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAMICH, Chief Judge.

I. Introduction

The 95 Plaintiffs in this action are GS-12 civilian engineering technicians at the Portsmouth and Puget Sound Naval Shipyards, seeking unpaid overtime wages pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (hereinafter “FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq., and regulations implementing FLSA for federal employees, promulgated by the Office of Personnel Management, located at 5 C.F.R. Part 551. Compl. H1Í1, 8. Pending are Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment on its affirmative defense of accord and satisfaction (hereinafter “Def.’s Mot.”), filed March 11, 2003,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jaynes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  2. Jaynes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  3. PDR, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  4. Bull v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  5. Oasis International Waters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API