Legal Opinion
Jaynes v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 7, 2005No. 04-856CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.
Plaintiffs, five employees of the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard located in Bremerton, Washington, filed this action on June 15, 2004, alleging that defendant, the United States, failed to pay Environmental Differential Pay for “high work” as mandated by federal laws, regulations, and a collective bargaining agreement.1
Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on July 14, 2004, dividing their claims into three separate counts.2 On August 13, 2004, the Government filed an answer to plaintiffs’ amended complaint. On November 5, 2004, plaintiffs filed a motion…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Sweats Fashions, Inc. v. Pannill Knitting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Wright v. Universal Maritime Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- National Bank of Arizona v. ThrustonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Jaynes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Filosa v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Land Grantors in Henderson, Union & Webster Counties v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Jaynes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.