Legal Opinion

United States v. Diebold, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 14, 1962No. 286PublishedCited by 6,915 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a civil antitrust suit by the Government challenging Diebold’s acquisition of the assets of the Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Company as being violative of § 7 of the Clayton Act. On motion of Diebold the District Court entered summary judgment against the Government on the ground that the acquired firm was a “failing company” under the doctrine of International Shoe Co. v. Federal Trade Comm’n, 280 U. S. 291 (1930). The case is here on direct appeal. 368 U. S. 894.

In determining that the acquisition of the assets of Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Company was not a violation of § 7, the District…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. International Shoe Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

3Cited by6,915 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Juan Albino v. Lee BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

6,910 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API