Legal Opinion
PDR, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 30, 2007No. 03-2047 CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*202 OPINION AND ORDER
GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Government’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(b) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). The Government filed its motion (“Def.’s Mot.,” docket entry 48) on March 9, 2007. Plaintiff PDR, Inc. filed its opposition (“Pl.’s Opp’n,” docket entry 53) on May 23, 2007. The Government filed its reply (“Def.’s Reply,” docket entry 58) on July 19, 2007.
The Court concludes, for the reasons set forth below, that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the quantum meruit claim set…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Spectrum Sciences v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Demodulation, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Coffee Connections, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Freeman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Compliance Solutions Occupational Trainers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.