Legal Opinion
Jaynes v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 14, 2007No. 04-856CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.
This matter is before the Court after a three-day trial held in Seattle, Washington, from November 6-8, 2006. The Court must determine whether the parties entered into an accord and satisfaction of the claims asserted by plaintiffs in this action. Plaintiffs’ claims relate to (1) the criteria used by the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard (the “Shipyard”) to determine the circumstances under which it would pay certain Environmental Differential Pay, and (2) plaintiffs’ entitlement to back Environmental Differential Pay. Defendant argues that the Shipyard’s…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- The United States v. Patrick J. ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Nvt Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Heritage of America, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- West Bay Builders, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Jay Cashman, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- BPLW Architects & Engineers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Semper v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.