Legal Opinion
Duncan v. Walker
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 18, 2001No. 00-121PublishedCited by 2,338 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor
Title 28 U. S. C. § 2244(d)(2) (1994 ed., Supp. V) provides: “The time during which a properly filed application for State post-conviction or other collateral review with respect to the pertinent judgment or claim is pending shall not be counted toward any period of limitation under this subsection.” This case presents the question whether a federal habeas corpus petition is an “application for State post-conviction or other collateral review” within the meaning of this provision.
I
In 1992, several judgments of conviction for robbery were entered against respondent Sherman Walker in the *170New…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2,338 opinions
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Xiao Ji Chen v. United States Department of Justice, Attorney General Alberto R. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Munaf v. GerenSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Lawrence v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
2,333 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.