Legal Opinion

Bull v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 2, 2005No. 01-56 CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HEWITT, Judge.

Before the court is the parties’ briefing addressing the effect, if any, of the 1996 National Agreement, the collective bargaining agreement between the National Treasury Employees Union and the United States Customs Service, on plaintiffs’ claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 (2000). At the request of the court, the National Treasury Employees Union also filed briefing as amicus curiae. For the following reasons, the court finds that the statutory rights plaintiffs have asserted in this action were not waived by the parties’ collective…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bull v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  2. Hohnke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. Jaynes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  4. Zaccardelli v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  5. Long v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API