Legal Opinion

Weiland v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 5, 1983No. WCB 79-06914, 79-03871; CA A25284PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Claimant appeals an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that reversed the referee and held that claimant’s occupational disease was not caused by his employment at Lane County. He further appeals the Board’s affirmance of the referee’s holding that he had not timely filed his claim against Linn County. We hold that the Board erred in the first holding and reverse.

Claimant seeks compensation for transient visual loss and migraine headaches, which he claims are an occupational disease caused by anxiety and stress in his employment. He became employed as a law enforcement officer in 1961.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. GygiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  2. McGarrah v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. Hamlin v. Roseburg Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. Compensation of Abbott v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. SAIF Corp. v. Carlos-MaciasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. Elwood v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. Taylor v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. Dillon v. Whirlpool Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. Robinson v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API