Legal Opinion

Dillon v. Whirlpool Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 21, 2001No. 99-07184, 99-03655; CA A111025PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) affirming employer’s denial of his claim for injury to his lower back. Claimant argues that the Board erred as a matter of law in failing to defer to the opinion of the treating physician as to the compensability of his claim and as a matter of fact in finding that he had failed to establish compensability. We affirm.

We take the facts from the findings of the Board. Claimant worked for employer as an appliance repair person. He had a prior history of injuries to his lower back. On July 1, 1998, in the course of his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Weiland v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. Winters v. Woodburn Carcraft Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. Argonaut Insurance v. MageskeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cummings v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. Kniss v. Public Employees Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. Bluemer v. Southland IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. SAIF Corp. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. Sullivan v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API