Robinson v. SAIF Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.
This workers’ compensation case is before us for the second time. In Robinson v. SAIF, 69 Or App 534, 686 P2d 1053, rev den 298 Or 238 (1984), we reversed the Board, finding that claimant had timely filed her claim. She petitions for judicial review of the Board’s order on remand, reversing the referee’s order and denying her occupational disease claim. The issue is whether her occupation caused a chemical sensitivity. On de novo review we find that claimant has satisfied her burden of proof. We reverse.
Claimant is 55 years old. She suffers from a hypersensitivity to certain chemicals:…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matter of Compensation of BrackeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- James v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. GygiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Dethlefs v. Hyster Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Hutcheson v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bruns v. Paccar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- Intalco Aluminum Corp. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- Earl v. Cryovac, a Division of W.R. Grace Co.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1989
- Clark v. Erdman Meat PackingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Canavan's CaseMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.