SAIF Corp. v. Carlos-Macias
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEgan, J.
Employer Sherman Paint & Collision, and its workers’ compensation insurer SAIF Corporation (collectively, petitioners) seek judicial review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (board), which determined that there was a causal relationship between requested diagnostic medical services and claimant’s accepted conditions sufficient to support the compensability of those diagnostic services under ORS 656.245(l)(a). Petitioners assert that the board erred when it upheld the denial of claimant’s current condition while simultaneously finding a sufficient causal relationship between the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brown v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Schleiss v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2013
- Brooks v. TimberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Weiland v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- SAIF Corp. v. SwartzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Brown v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2017
- Garcia-Solis v. Farmers Ins. Co. (In re Comp. of Garcia-Solis)Oregon Supreme Court · 2019
- Easton v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Hutchings v. Americas PropaneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- SAIF Corp. v. BalesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.